Each year on March 2 we observe World Teen Mental Wellness Day, which aims to raise awareness and destigmatize mental health issues experienced by teenagers, and to expand the conversation around available resources. There is an ongoing mental health and substance use crisis in our country. Families everywhere experience difficult and challenging experiences as their loved ones are cycled in and out of a system dealing with workforce shortages and resource issues. HMA works extensively to address the opportunities and challenges inherent in our struggling behavioral health system, including substance use disorder and on child welfare and family resilience programs throughout the country. #WorldTeenMentalWellnessDay
One such program is , an independent initiative developed by Heidi Arthur and Ellen Breslin, both HMA Principals, who co-founded the initiative, informed by their own family members鈥� experience and by their expertise in behavioral health policy and practice. As parents of children who nearly died on multiple occasions from severe behavioral health conditions, the co-founders are driven to inform the transformation of the youth behavioral healthcare system. As behavioral health professionals who found themselves struggling to navigate the many challenges facing their own children, they realized that their knowledge, desperation, and resources afforded their children access to interventions that should be available to every child and youth in need of services. Their experience of the care delivery system has also inspired their commitment to highlight the urgent improvements necessary to support struggling children and parents affected by the nation鈥檚 youth behavioral health crisis.
The co-founders published the initial Lifting Voices report in October 2023. Since then, the team has engaged multiple youth and family collaborators and state and national partners. They presented the report and their ongoing efforts at national and state conferences.
They developed a second iteration of the surveys and a website to scale the dissemination effort, with collaborators, who developed the website and who helped to develop the survey.
鈥淲e felt an imperative to lift the voices of youth and families experiencing mental health and substance use conditions,鈥� says co-founder, Ellen Breslin.
Heidi Arthur added, 鈥淪o far we鈥檝e received just over 100 survey responses. As we reach each 100-response milestone we plan to collaborate with our network of youth and family advisors to distill key findings that we can share in order to inform improvements to the system.鈥� They plan to release the first report in May 2025.
In February 2025, the team was invited by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Office of Recovery to participate in workgroups providing input into a toolkit for family and caregivers and to further define and describe SAMHSA鈥檚 framework of community-based recovery supports.
You can join national organizations and state agencies in disseminating the secure, anonymous Lifting Voices surveys by simply sharing the link and inviting families and youth to participate.
Findings will be disseminated with the goal of sharing the experience that youth/young adults and parents/caregivers are having as they seek services for child and youth mental health and/or substance use.
To learn more about this project, or inquire about ways that HMA can help with other behavioral health, child welfare, or substance use disorder issues, contact a member of our behavioral health team.
This week, our In Focus section highlights President Trump鈥檚 Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) , which is designed to address the challenges driving chronic diseases in the United States. Our article delves into the key components of the order, presents a data snapshot about the state of children鈥檚 health, and discusses implications for stakeholders seeking to prepare for and inform the transitions impacting the future of children鈥檚 health.
Presidents can use executive orders to communicate their priorities and set a framework and timelines for federal agency actions. Historically, these orders have provided strong signals for the initiatives and policy direction that federal departments and agencies will pursue. 明升88 (HMA), experts are monitoring the MAHA directive and several other executive orders, alongside other Trump Administration actions.
Executive Order: Making Children Healthy
On February 13, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order establishing the Make America Healthy Again Commission, chaired by US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. The commission, which builds on the Secretary鈥檚 prior work, is charged with combating 鈥渃ritical health challenges facing citizens, including the rising rates of mental health disorders, obesity, diabetes, and other chronic diseases.鈥�
Initially, the commission will focus on studying and addressing childhood chronic diseases. The order directs the commission to release within 30 days an assessment that summarizes what is known about the childhood chronic disease crisis, identifies gaps in knowledge, and includes international comparisons. This report will serve as the foundation for developing a strategy to improve the health of children, which is due within 180 days of the order.
Data Snapshot: Childhood Chronic Conditions
Evaluating existing data and identifying gaps in data for children are critical initial steps toward developing a comprehensive and evidence-driven federal policy agenda. At present, 90 percent of the $4.5 trillion in annual US healthcare expenditures are used to provide services to people with chronic and mental health conditions. Many of the risk factors for developing these conditions begin in childhood and some are preventable. For example:
鈥痑蹿蹿别肠迟蝉听, putting them at risk of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and some cancers. More than one in three young adults ages 17鈭�24 are too heavy to join the US military.鈥疶he youth obesity rate from 2017鈭�2020 was聽, a 42 percent increase from the rate in 1999鈭�2000.聽Lifestyle choices, combined with social and environmental factors like access to healthy foods and neighborhood walkability and safety can significantly reduce the risk of developing obesity.聽
In 2022, diabetes and the complications associated with it accounted for $413 billion in total medical costs and lost wages in the United States. While few children have type 2 diabetes, nearly one in five adolescents (12鈭�18 years old) have prediabetes and may develop diabetes in adulthood. Like obesity, both personal choices and adverse social and environmental factors can increase the lifetime risk of developing diabetes.聽
础辫辫谤辞虫颈尘补迟别濒测听聽in the United States have asthma, which is incurable but can be managed. Asthma is one of the main causes for missed school days among children. Many US schools have poor indoor air quality, which can expose children to allergens, irritants, and triggers such as mold, dust, and pests. Conditions in children鈥檚 homes also can exacerbate asthma.
How Federal Programs Impact Children鈥檚 Health
Numerous federal programs directly and indirectly affect children鈥檚 health. Examples include:
Nationally, more than 38 percent of children have Medicaid coverage, with rates exceeding 50 percent in some states and territories (e.g., Louisiana, New Mexico, Puerto Rico). Medicaid鈥檚 requirement to cover Early Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT) has long been the vehicle for addressing the chronic healthcare needs of children on Medicaid. For example, for children with asthma, in addition to covering medications to prevent and treat exacerbations, some states will reimburse providers for conducting home health assessments to identify and remediate triggers in the home. In addition, federal funding through both Medicaid and US Department of Education supports school nurses and school-based health centers, which can be critical resources in addressing the chronic healthcare needs of students, such as the administration of Insulin or providing inhalers to children experiencing asthma.聽
To receive funding through the National School Lunch and School Breakfast programs, schools must provide meals aligned with the 鈥溾�� established by US Department of Agriculture, which specifies the amount of food among various groups and an age-based maximum for calories, saturated fat, and sodium. Under current guidelines, by 2027, school meals also will be expected to comply with limits on added sugars.聽
Participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), which provides participants with certain foods to meet their nutritional needs, have a聽聽for preterm birth, low birthweight infants, and infant mortality.聽
Federal programs affect children鈥檚 home and school environment in other ways, and the health implications of those funding choices may not be explicitly recognized or prioritized. For example:
Housing assistance programs in some cases prevent families from experiencing homelessness but may place them in living situations where exposure to environmental hazards such as mold, pests, or pollution and neighborhood factors like crime and lack of walkability may adversely affect their health.聽
Some federal agriculture programs are specifically designed to make nutritious foods available (e.g., Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program, or聽), while others聽聽without specifically bringing a health lens to those programs.
Implications for Stakeholders
The President has directed that the strategy address 鈥渁ppropriately restructuring the Federal Government鈥檚 response to the childhood chronic disease crisis, including by ending Federal practices that exacerbate the health crisis or unsuccessfully attempt to address it, and by adding powerful new solutions that will end childhood chronic disease.鈥� Though we do not know what the Make our Children Healthy Again Assessment and Strategy will recommend, we anticipate it will present both opportunities and risks for organizations focused on children鈥檚 health. As the commission begins its work, organizations can take the following actions:
Consider policy opportunities: Review your organization鈥檚 strategic plan as well as your operational and policy priorities and consider how they may fit into this framework. This could be the time to suggest changes to federal grants you receive or federal regulations or requirements that negatively affect your ability to keep children healthy.聽
Prepare for potential funding disruptions: It is possible that programs you rely on will have changes in scope or funding levels. Review your offerings for children with chronic conditions and identify substitutes or complements to your main priorities. Consider partners you might work with to keep work going that may not have the same level of federal support in the future.聽
Be prepared to share the real-world impacts of policy changes: Begin gathering data, stories, and compelling information to share about chronic conditions affecting children that can be used in future public comment opportunities, shared with the media, and discussed with your federal, state, and local representatives. Think about how to talk about these issues in a clear and compelling way that will resonate with each of those audiences.聽
Find partners and allies: As you consider the policy opportunities and risks, think about other organizations that share your interests and how you can work with them in complementary ways. It can be compelling to policymakers when stakeholders who might not naturally be aligned on other issues can unite around a specific policy area.聽
Connect with Us
Healthcare stakeholders with a commitment to healthy children and healthy adults have an opportunity to support the specific policies and funding opportunities that may emerge from the MAHA order. To learn more about these policy changes, the impact on your organization,鈥痑nd actions your organization can take, contact our one of our featured experts below.聽
More than ever, facing the challenges of housing insecurity is becoming a top priority for communities nationwide. Here鈥檚 why.
Direct impact on health: The quality of housing directly affects physical and behavioral health. People experiencing homelessness are at higher risk for illness, mental health issues, and death. Substandard housing leads not only to higher incidence of illness, but also greater exposure to toxins like lead and asbestos that exacerbate health problems.
Cost burdens of housing issues: Overcrowding, substandard housing, eviction, and homelessness all lead to poor economic outcomes, lower infant birthweights, mental health challenges, chronic disease, and higher mortality.
Effects on healthcare access: Due to high housing costs,half of renters delay medical care because they can’t afford it. And people experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity have a much harder time accessing healthcare.
Rise in homelessness: After homelessness hit a record high in 2023, it increased another 18% from 2023 to 2024. More than 771,800 people in the U.S. lived without housing in 2024.聽聽聽聽
To address these issues, we are announcing the launch of the HMA Housing and Health Solutions team. HMA has brought together a team of experts who understand the challenges that homelessness and housing insecurity present to community health. Bringing together partners across all sectors, we help craft effective solutions for populations that lack access to stable housing and healthcare. 鈥�
Our team includes former directors of national, state, and municipal government housing departments, nonprofit affordable housing organizations, and housing financing and investment.
We鈥檙e pleased to announce the addition of two well-renowned housing experts to the team. Andy McMahon joins HMA after spending over seven years at UnitedHealthcare and UnitedHealth Group. Andy has over two decades of executive experience spanning healthcare, housing, human services and community development, and worked with UHC Medicaid plans nationwide on various policy issues to improve care for the most complex populations. Doug Shoemaker joins HMA after leading Mercy Housing California for 13 years.聽 Prior to Mercy Housing, Doug directed the Mayor鈥檚 Office of Housing and Community Development in San Francisco.聽 Doug focuses on the intersection of housing, community development and healthcare to advance projects and policy that improve outcomes for lower-income individuals and communities.聽
Come meet some of our team members at the NAEH conference Feb 26 and 27 in Los Angeles, CA and visit us at the HMA booth in the exhibit hall. HMA鈥檚 Dena Hasan will be presenting, 鈥淒oes Secret Domestic Violence Housing Lead to Unsheltered Homelessness?鈥� on 2/26 at 2:30 in San Gabriel ABC, and 鈥淒oes Medicaid Hold the Key to Housing?鈥� at 3:45pm in Santa Anita AB.
This week, our聽In Focus聽section highlights insights from a new 明升88 (HMA) issue brief,聽Digital Quality Transformation.聽The brief, released in January 2025, explores the transition from traditional manual data extraction for use in quality measurement to fully automated digital quality measurement (dQM). It examines the challenges, benefits, and policy changes that are driving this transformation with a focus on how payers and providers can leverage digital tools and open data standards to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance patient care and value-based payment models.
Following is a summary of key points from the brief about the evolution of traditional quality reporting in healthcare, which has depended on structured claims, administrative data, and manual chart abstraction. This process tends to be expensive, inefficient, and unable to capture data from a population perspective. We highlight the challenges and strategic steps that organizations should be taking now to prepare for the federally required dQM transition.
Current State
Traditional manual quality measurement methods are costly and inefficient. Generally, providers are expected to submit a sample of medical records (usually about 400 charts per measure). Once received, trained staff extract key data fields from those charts and enter them into another database, where the data are then used to augment claims data. This process results in significant gaps in and delays in information regarding quality of care, is prone to manual entry errors, and represents only a small portion of the patient population. Accreditation bodies like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) are moving away from these outdated methods, signaling a shift toward more comprehensive and automated collection of clinical data. Facilitating this movement is the increasing availability of digital tools, APIs, and interoperability standards designed to streamline data exchange.
Federal Policy Landscape
The , the and the collectively are contributing to improve the ability of providers, payers, and applications to access health information using HL7 FHIR APIs. Although it is unclear whether the Trump Administration will revise aspects of certain existing regulatory policies, the commitment to interoperable, standardized, reusable data has been a bipartisan issue and was supported by the previous Trump Administration. This transition to digital health measures could even accelerate to meet changing expectations for efficiency and improved quality.
Key federal and state efforts include:
Roadmap for Digital Quality Measurement
The outlines necessary actions for a transition to fully digital measures by 2030. Organizations like the NCQA already are converting healthcare quality measures (e.g., HEDIS庐) into digital formats using non-claims-based data sources in preparation for a full transition to digital measures in 2030. Key stakeholders, including the Digital Quality Implementation Community (DQIC) led by , an HMA company, are driving industry alignment with these new federal mandates. Organizations that proactively invest in digital quality measurement will be well-positioned for future compliance and improved healthcare outcomes.
States are also starting to plan for the implementation of these digital requirements. The , led in partnership with Gov. Spencer Cox and is one example of state-level leadership to support and maximize the use of digital health measures. The pilot is designed to enable providers, payers, and individuals to aggregate and share clinical and claims information from anywhere in Utah鈥檚 healthcare ecosystem. The statewide Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)-based ecosystem leverages modern application programming interface (API) standards as required at the federal level. This pilot will aid Utah in its fully digital quality measurement transition by ensuring that health data are standardized and easily accessible, which is crucial for accurate and efficient quality measurement.
Challenges and Opportunities in Digital Quality Transformation
As the industry moves toward full adoption of dQM by 2030, healthcare organizations should be focusing on how to strategically leverage this transformation. Though the transition to digital quality measurement presents significant opportunities, key challenges include:
Workforce adaptation: Healthcare professionals accustomed to traditional reporting methods may need significant training to effectively use real-time data for decision making.
Shifts in payer-provider dynamics: With greater data transparency, reimbursement models may evolve rapidly, demanding more agile contract negotiations.
Data governance: Ensuring that the influx of newly accessible clinical data are properly validated and interpreted.
Vendor management: Organizations will need to rethink their relationship with vendors, specifically as plans reduce their reliance on manual processes.
New vendor requirements may pivot toward data validation and analytic tools to ensure compliance with NCQA鈥檚 standards.
Compliance with FHIR-based data exchange and CMS鈥檚 Interoperability & Patient Access Rule, which mandates standardized data sharing across different systems.
Data standardization: Different healthcare systems will need to use common data formats and terminologies to ensure interoperability.
What鈥檚 Next
As federal policies and regulations accelerate the transition to dQM, healthcare stakeholders must prepare by investing in interoperable technologies and adapting their quality reporting business processes accordingly. They should track developments and new opportunities at the federal and state levels and direct organizational attention and resources to the multiyear transition through the following approaches:
Evaluating of the current landscape, envisioning future pathways for dQM, and establishing achievable objectives for their organization
Developing strategic plans with the achievable objectives and enumerating tactical and implementation plans that address identified risks
Focusing on implementation, identifying and dashboarding your key performance indicators and metrics, making adaptations based on your evaluation
Connect With Us
Providers, payers, patients, and states all have a vested interest in ensuring fully digital quality measurement, as it will be essential to staying ahead in this rapidly evolving landscape. For details about this analysis, its implications for states and other organizations, and additional information, contact our experts below.
This week, our鈥�In Focus鈥痵ection highlights key insights from a new 明升88 (HMA), white paper,鈥�. Experts from HMA and Wakely, an HMA company, used the national Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) database to learn more about specialty provider networks and examine the provision of specialty services across various states.
The analysis, released in January 2025 with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, focuses on three representative services that are relatively common, potentially difficult for Medicaid beneficiaries to access, significantly affect quality of life, typically accessed as elective procedures, and unlikely to be provided by other clinicians, such as primary care or mid-level practitioners.
T-MSIS Analysis Overview
T-MSIS analytic files are a comprehensive resource for Medicaid encounter, beneficiary demographics, program enrollment, service utilization, and payment data. Individual states compile their Medicaid claims data and submit monthly files to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). As each state submits data individually, numerous state-specific variations occur in data availability and quality. Currently, T-MSIS data are available for 2016鈭�2023. HMA data scientists have permission to use the T-MSIS files for healthcare services research.
This paper examines services in 10 states that met a threshold of data integrity in the T-MSIS dataset for 2022. Other important design aspects of the analysis are as follows:
The three service procedures included in the analysis are total knee replacement (TKA), cataract removal, and impacted tooth extraction.聽
Selected states represented a diverse sample of geographic, socioeconomic, and other demographic factors.聽聽
The analysis includes non-dually eligible adult populations, ages 22鈭�64 years.聽聽
The data cover all services provided in 2022 for each procedure and the providers who rendered the service; facilities are excluded.聽聽
Concentration of Specialty Providers
Table 1 summarizes findings about the concentration of specialty services.
The authors further analyzed the provision of services and, building on a previous study, examined network concentration. Findings were as follows:
When looking at the same procedure across states, no consistent pattern emerged regarding which states had the highest and lowest concentration of services in the top 10/25 percentile of providers.聽
However, when looking at the same procedure across multiple states, TKA tended to have the lowest concentration of services among those studied.聽聽
Regardless of procedure and state, the 50 percent of providers with the lowest number of procedures tended to provide fewer than 10 percent of the total services combined.聽
These findings suggest that the specialty networks within each state are highly nuanced, and state policymakers need to look at individual specialty networks when considering health policy. State policymakers and managed care organizations (MCOs) need to examine each specialty individually to assess the distribution of services and access to care.
Looking Ahead
Timely access to healthcare services is critical for ensuring optimal health outcomes. The report authors鈥� analysis of T-MSIS data showed significant concentration of selected specialty services among providers, which may affect appropriate access to these services.
The analysis of concentration of specialty services among Medicaid specialty providers can guide MCOs and state policymakers in developing strategies to improve network adequacy, including clarifying the level of network adequacy and developing policies to assess and regulate access to specialty care. Addressing gaps in access to specialty care can contribute to better health outcomes for Medicaid beneficiaries and may be aligned with provisions in value-based contracts.
Connect with Us
Medicaid consumers, providers, MCOs, and states all have an interest in ensuring access to specialty care for Medicaid beneficiaries. The methodology applied in the analysis for the HMA white paper can be applied and adapted for future analysis to monitor network stability and to compare access among various payers.
For details about this analysis, its implications for state and local policies, and additional research using T-MSIS, contact聽our experts below.
As policymakers engage the state budget process, Medicaid continues to play a critical role. This role is programmatic, serving as the source of coverage for 1 in 4 Ohioans, including as the finance mechanism for half of all births in the state and the primary source of coverage for the elderly and disabled. However, a number of proposals are currently being discussed by the House, including changing how poverty programs are adjusted for inflation, reversing some Medicaid payment expansions, lowering the minimum federal funding rate for Medicaid, making the federal funding rate the same for all Medicaid expansion populations, limiting taxes on Medicaid providers, capping the amount spent per Medicaid enrollee, standardizing how administrative costs are matched, and other unspecified changes to Medicaid funding through Medicaid match. But these proposals can鈥檛 be viewed in isolation because the program is deeply intertwined with Ohio鈥檚 ability to have a balanced budget, serving a role in reducing direct state spending by enabling the draw down of federal dollars through 鈥淔MAP.鈥� But what is FMAP and what happens if Congress fundamentally changes how it鈥檚 calculated?
FMAP
The Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) is a critical component of Medicaid funding, ensuring that states receive federal support to provide healthcare services to low-income individuals. FMAP is calculated based on a state’s per capita income relative to the national average. States with lower per capita incomes receive a higher FMAP, meaning the federal government covers a larger share of Medicaid costs, while states with higher per capita incomes receive a lower FMAP. The FMAP formula ensures that states with greater financial need, like , receive more federal assistance. For Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2025, Ohio’s FMAP is 64.6%, which means that for every dollar Ohio spends on most Medicaid services, 64.6 cents comes from the federal government. Even then, much of the state share is financed through fees on entities like hospitals, nursing facilities and health insurance companies.
Contextually, Ohio is a 鈥渞ecipient state,鈥� indicating it receives more in federal tax revenue than it collects to finance the program. And, as was noted in , Ohio continues to lag other states in terms of economic growth and has an aging population. As such, the availability and predictability of federal funding is a critical input in future years, particularly in long term care where most of the expense will continue to increase. With Congress deliberating all of these proposals, what could the impact be in Ohio? To illustrate, it may be good to focus on one area: the elimination of enhanced federal funding for those covered by the Medicaid expansion.
Impacts
There has been some discussion during testimony that if the FMAP rate for the expansion population were to change, it could trigger an automatic end to the expansion itself. Importantly, there would be a disproportionate impact in Ohio鈥檚 rural counties where expansion coverage rates are higher. In fact, as of December 2024, 362,829 individuals in rural Ohio counties received their coverage through expansion, alone. These individuals, in addition to the 1.1 million others in these Ohio counties, rely on Medicaid for essential healthcare services, including addiction treatment.
highlighting the importance of maintaining robust funding for these programs. Expansion has also been the primary source of funding for addiction treatment in the state, with Medicaid . If expansion were eliminated due to the change in FMAP, the consequences for treatment may mean either a greater obligation on the state to finance those services directly, or, Ohio may exacerbate the opioid use disorder crisis, putting additional strain on our healthcare system, particularly for behavioral health providers.
Conclusion
As we consider the future of Ohio’s Medicaid expansion, it’s essential to recognize the critical role that FMAP plays in sustaining our healthcare system and supporting our state’s economy. Any changes to the FMAP rate must be carefully evaluated to ensure that we do not undermine the progress we have made in expanding access to care and addressing the opioid crisis.
Beyond the immediate impact on healthcare services, changes to FMAP could also have broader economic implications for Ohio. Medicaid represents about 4% of the state’s GDP, playing a vital role in supporting jobs and economic activity. If just 1% of that GDP were suddenly eliminated due to a cut in federal or state funding, the consequences could be severe. A sudden reduction in Medicaid funding could lead to job losses in the healthcare sector, reduced economic activity, reduced labor force participation, and increased financial strain on state and local governments. The ripple effects would be felt across the economy, impacting not only healthcare providers but also businesses and communities that rely on the stability and support provided by Medicaid as well as the budgetary stability it provides to Ohio鈥檚 process.
This week, our In Focus section examines governors鈥� healthcare priorities from their 2025 State of the State addresses. This article highlights common themes in addresses delivered between January 6, 2025, and January 16, 2025, and delves into specific proposals in Georgia, Iowa, New York, and Oregon, as analyzed in the 明升88 (HMA), Information Services (HMAIS) interim report, 2025 State of the State Overview.
State of the States in the Current Environment
Governors use their State of the State addresses to outline their priorities for the year, giving insight into the agendas and initiatives that their executive branches may pursue independently or in collaboration with their state legislature. These priorities often are informed by the status of the state鈥檚 budget, with some governors advancing healthcare proposals that will address budget deficits and others seeking to invest in services and workforce initiatives.
Monitoring governors鈥� policy priorities and initiatives is especially important in 2025 given the changing federal landscape. The transition in both the administration and Congress will require state leaders to carefully consider the risks and opportunities. As detailed below, governors鈥� responses will unfold differently across states and markets.
Common Threads
In all, 24 governors delivered a State of the State Address between January 6, 2025, and January 16, 2025. Many gubernatorial leaders have similar areas of priority and concern, with some continuing multiyear initiatives to address unmet behavioral health needs and control healthcare costs. Table 1 identifies the themes emerging from the first group of addresses.
Governors also are considering possible policy changes under the new Trump Administration. For example, some governors reported that their state is looking to strengthen or add Medicaid work requirements to their programs, resuming initiatives that were initially pursued during the first Trump Administration. Though not directly related to healthcare, governors鈥� decisions to mirror President Trump鈥檚 Department of Government Efficiency, with Iowa as an example, could indirectly affect local programs and markets. Other states are considering the implications of possible changes to federal Medicaid funding. A deeper look into the priorities in Georgia, Iowa, New York, and Oregon follows.
Georgia
Gov. Brian Kemp Georgia鈥檚 State of the State address on January 16, 2025, during which he focused his healthcare remarks on the state鈥檚 Section 1115 demonstration. Georgia鈥檚 waiver extends Medicaid coverage to able-bodied adults who earn up to the federal poverty level if they meet certain work requirements. The governor emphasized that he intends to work with the Trump Administration to further advance innovative approaches to healthcare access.
Governor Kemp stated that his administration is making it easier to apply for Medicaid coverage and will submit an to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that would extend the Pathways demonstration for five years beyond the current expiration date of September 30, 2025. The state plans to request several changes to the demonstration, including:
Changing the reporting requirements for qualified work activities
Adding more activities that qualify for program eligibility
Adding a retroactive coverage policy
Removing premiums and Member Reports Accounts
The governor’s proposed fiscal year (FY) 2026 includes $324 million to fully fund projected Medicaid enrollment and utilization growth and $36 million in additional support for pharmacy benefits, including recently approved gene therapy treatments for sickle cell disease.
Iowa
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds the Condition of the State Address on January 14, 2025, during which she called for increased Medicaid reimbursement rates for OB/GYNs and primary care physicians who provide care to people with complex pregnancy cases, as well as certified nurse midwives. The governor also said she was in favor of adding doula services as a covered Medicaid benefit. Governor Reynolds is one of several governors who have announced plans to pursue a Section 1115 demonstration for Medicaid work requirements for able-bodied adults.
Governor Reynolds鈥檚 proposed FY 2026 includes investing $642,000 in newly unbundled Medicaid maternal rates, and more than double investments in five existing state healthcare loan repayment programs. The governor also proposes to establish a Medicaid Graduate Medical Education enhanced payment to draw down more than $150 million in federal dollars for more residency spots in Iowa鈥檚 teaching hospitals.
New York
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul her State of the State Address on January 14, 2025, at which time she also released a . Addressing behavioral health is one of her chief priorities, and proposals include:
Allowing more involuntary commitments for people with severe mental illness
Developing programs to support youth mental health through after school programs
Expanding peer support programs
Improving the diagnostic process for children with complex needs
Supporting mental wellness in historically marginalized neighborhoods
Expanding Mobile Medication Units to bring opioid treatments to underserved areas
Governor Hochul intends to expand support for the state鈥檚 healthcare safety net. This part of her agenda would provide financial assistance to struggling medical facilities and hospitals through expansion of the state鈥檚 Safety Net Transformation Program and participation in the US Food and Drug Administration鈥檚 program that allows states to import lower-cost drugs from Canada.
The governor鈥檚 proposed $252 billion for FY 2026 would allocate $35.4 billion for the state Health Department鈥檚 Medicaid budget鈥攁 14 percent increase from last year. Governor Hochul plans to offset some of the spending hike with revenue from the newly approved managed care organization tax, which is expected to raise $3.7 billion to help balance the state budget over three years.
Oregon
Gov. Tina Kotek Oregon鈥檚 2025 State of the State Address on January 13, 2025. The governor has a significant focus on mental health and substance use disorder treatment, as well as housing as an HRSN. Governor Kotek wants to strengthen the behavioral health system and proposed adding new treatment beds, increasing treatment capacity, eliminating backlogs at the state鈥檚 health licensing boards to improve access to qualified counselors, improving the provider pipeline, and increasing worker retention. During her speech, the governor also called for improved frontend care coordination to decrease the overflow of people at the Oregon State Hospital.
In addition, the governor intends to work toward improving care for the civil commitment population (i.e., people who are involuntarily detained in a psychiatric hospital) by dedicating permanent supportive housing funds to expanded residences with onsite services. Governor Kotek has directed her team to develop a new intensive permanent supportive housing model to more effectively support people with serious mental health needs.
Governor Kotek鈥檚 proposed for the 2025鈭�2027 biennium includes $39.6 billion for the Oregon Health Authority, representing a 10.4 percent increase from the approved budget for 2023鈭�2025. This budget includes $29.6 billion for the state Medicaid program and $1.6 billion for the Behavioral Health Division, in addition to $732.4 million for the division from the General Fund.
Connect With Us
has prepared a comprehensive report summarizing each State of the State Address, which is available to HMAIS subscribers. The report also examines proposed budgets, highlighting key financial commitments and allocations that underscore these priorities for the upcoming year. The first iteration of the report covers AR, AZ, CO, CT, GA, IA, ID, KS, KY, MA, MT, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OR, RI, SD, VA, VT, WA, and WY. The document will be updated periodically as speeches occur.
Contact our experts below for more information about the report or to connect with one of HMA鈥檚 state policy and market experts.
This week, our In Focus section highlights how the new Administration and Congress are poised to significantly change healthcare policies, ranging from health equity and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace subsidies to Medicaid services and prescription drug costs. Stakeholders seeking to influence these potential changes should plan to engage quickly. Today鈥檚 section covers important developments that occurred through 2 pm January 29, and healthcare stakeholders will need to remain attune to future developments impacting federal healthcare programs.
Executive Action
Over the first week of his second term, President Donald J. Trump has issued several executive orders (EOs) and presidential directives affecting healthcare stakeholders. Presidents have increasingly used EOs at the beginning of their administration to rescind policies of their predecessors and direct the federal departments and agencies to exercise their authorities in line with the president鈥檚 directives.
Though some EOs require no further action, many are just the beginning of the policymaking process, with agencies tasked with implementing the directives. This timeline can provide stakeholders with opportunities to work with to policymakers to inform how they shape the rules for compliance with these directives.
Initial EOs issued so far by President Trump include policies that:
, including:
Executive Order 13985 of January 20, 2021, Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government聽
Executive Order 13988 of January 20, 2021, Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation聽
Executive Order 13990 of January 20, 2021, Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis聽
Executive Order 14009 of January 28, 2021, Strengthening Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act聽
Executive Order 14070 of April 5, 2022, Continuing to Strengthen Americans鈥� Access to Affordable, Quality Health Coverage聽
Executive Order 14075 of June 15, 2022, Advancing Equality for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Individuals聽
Executive Order 14087, of October 19, 2022, Lowering Prescription Drug Costs for Americans聽
聽the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the Attorney General, and Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to 鈥渃oordinate the termination of all discriminatory programs,鈥� including diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, policies, and activities in the federal government.聽
聽鈥渋llegal private-sector diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.鈥澛�
聽federal rulemaking until department heads appointed or designated by the president can review and approve the rules and withdraw rules that have been sent to but not yet published in the聽Federal Register聽so they can be reviewed.聽
聽and implement the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) as a temporary organization within the Executive Office of the President that reports to the White House Chief of Staff. Executive agencies are directed to establish DOGE teams of at least four employees. DOGE is intended to modernize Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity.聽
聽OMB, OPM, and DOGE to submit a plan within 90 days to reduce the size of the federal government鈥檚 workforce through efficiency improvements and attrition.聽
Developments on the Federal Funding Pause
Notably, the White House OMB issued a memo () on January 27, 2025, to all agencies with instructions to temporarily pause and provide a comprehensive analysis of all activities related to obligation or disbursement of federal financial assistance programs that EOs may affect. On January 29, 2025, the administration retracted the directive for a temporary pause on federal payments, though reiterated it will continue to review federal funding.
Though it is customary for a new administration to pause communications, regulatory activity, and new funding opportunities as incoming political appointees are confirmed and policy agendas are solidified, the breadth of the federal funding pause exceeds prior orders. The first lawsuit was on January 28, and a federal judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia quickly issued a temporary stay on the federal funding pause until at least February 3, 2025, while she considers arguments in the case.
The now-rescinded January 27 memo was scheduled to take effect at 5:00 pm ET on January 28, 2025, to give the Trump Administration 鈥渢ime to review agency programs and determine the best uses of the funding for those programs consistent with the law and the President鈥檚 priorities.鈥� According to the memo, the pause did not apply to Medicare or Social Security payments. In a subsequent , OMB further clarified that 鈥渕andatory programs like Medicaid and SNAP [the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program] will continue without pause.鈥�
What to Watch: Executive Actions and Budget Reconciliation
The Trump Administration has indicated that federal programs and funding should be aligned with his administration鈥檚 priorities. Healthcare stakeholders should be prepared for additional scrutiny of future funding awards.
Meanwhile, congressional Republicans are preparing to quickly leverage the budget reconciliation process to pass legislation related to several priority areas, including taxes, immigration, and domestic energy production (see Spotlight on Congress: Budget Reconciliation Update). Budget reconciliation provides a rare opportunity to pass significant healthcare legislative changes on a party-line basis. House Republicans have begun to develop their menu of healthcare options, which range from changes to the ACA premium tax credit structure, expanding Health Savings Accounts, and changes in Medicaid financing and eligibility.
In a January 2025 ,鈥痚xperts from Leavitt Partners, an HMA company, , ,&苍产蝉辫;补苍诲鈥�痙iscussed the potential health policy priorities of the Trump Administration, the implications of reconciliation for healthcare stakeholders, and the challenges and opportunities presented while navigating this expedited process.
Navigating Change
HMA experts are working with federally funded entities to quickly analyze their federal awards and plan for the next phase of federal agency actions and oversight. HMA companies also help healthcare stakeholders seeking to inform, shape, prepare for, and implement federal policy changes. Organizations seeking to influence the outcome of these policy debates and to thrive in a dynamic legislative and regulatory environment must have the most up-to-date information, informed by partners that understand the processes and the underlying policies under consideration.
HMA experts provide additional complementary services, including analyses to predict how the Congressional Budget Office will score the costs or savings of specific policies. Especially in the reconciliation environment, the budgetary impact of particular policies can significantly influence their likelihood of passage.
Connect with Us
To learn more about the these policy changes and the impact on your organization,聽聽our January 2025 policy webinar and contact one of our featured experts below.
On January 6, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) approved Medicaid State Plan Amendment . The SPA authorizes the California Department of Health Care Services Service (DHCS) to use an alternative payment methodology (APM) to pay Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC), Rural Health Clinics (RHC), and Tribal Health Programs at the Medi-Cal fee-for-service (FFS) rate for dyadic services. FQHCs and RHCs will receive a separate payment for dyadic services in addition to their standard prospective payment system (PPS)/all-inclusive payment rates in certain circumstances. This SPA is retroactively effective to March 15, 2023.
Key provisions are as follows:
颁补濒颈蹿辞谤苍颈补鈥檚 new set of dyadic benefits supports relationship-based caregiver and family surveillance and family-based interventions that bolster child development, recognizing the importance of the parent/caregiver and child dyad to support healthy child development. Dyadic health care services are ideally provided in the context of routine well child care in pediatric settings, meeting families where they regularly receive health care and related services.
Services are linked to a child鈥檚 Medi-Cal coverage, providing a basis for revenue recovery for primary care pediatric settings and for cases in which the parent/caregiver may not be a Medi-Cal beneficiary.
Services are exempt from the same day exclusion applied to FQHCand RHC settings. If FQHCs or RHCs have met their visit per day limit, then dyadic services provided to Medi-Cal-eligible members (children or parents/caregivers) will be reimbursed at the FFS rate. Any dyadic services that are provided to a non-Medi-Cal-eligible parents/caregivers for the direct benefit of Medi-Cal-eligible children will be reimbursed at the FFS rate.
Payment for dyadic FQHC and RHC services will be reimbursed at the applicable FFS rate in addition to Medi-Cal member visits, which are reimbursed at the applicable PPS rate.
In addition, the dyadic care benefit provides a pathway for families to access additional supports via the new . Family therapy is a psychotherapy service that managed care plans provide under Medi-Cal鈥檚 Non-Specialty Mental Health Services benefits. Family therapy services support members younger than age 21 to receive up to five family therapy sessions before a mental health diagnosis is required. More importantly, children and youth (younger than age 21) may receive family therapy without the five-visit limitation if they (or their parents/caregivers) demonstrate certain risk factors, including separation from a parent/caregiver because of incarceration, immigration status, or death; foster care placement; food insecurity; housing instability; exposure to domestic violence or trauma; maltreatment; severe/persistent bullying; and discrimination.
明升88 (HMA) has been proud to partner with HealthySteps, as a DHCS-recognized model, to provide an evidence-based ( approach to implementing the new dyadic care benefits. Contact our experts below to learn more.
With full Republican control, expect Congressional Republicans and the Trump Administration to quickly leverage the budget reconciliation process to pass legislation in several priority areas, including taxes, immigration, and domestic energy production. While expiring tax provisions may be the driving force of this year鈥檚 reconciliation efforts, Republicans are also likely to include other priorities, potentially including raising the debt ceiling, which will increase the need for reductions in mandatory health programs or changes to health care revenue to be used as offsets.
Budget reconciliation provides a rare opportunity to pass significant health care legislative changes on a party-line basis. However, while budget reconciliation has certain procedural advantages, it is also fraught with complex rules and procedures that can make it very difficult to pass large pieces of policy legislation intact.
Experts from Leavitt Partners, an HMA company, recently held a webinar reviewing the budget reconciliation process, opportunities and legislative strategies to navigate this process, and potential policies that could be considered. Access the webinar replay . Contact experts Elizabeth Wroe, Josh Trent, and Sara Singleton if you鈥檙e interested in learning more about the specialized services our team can offer your organization to navigate the Congressional budget reconciliation process and its outcomes.
Trump Administration and Congress to Consider Policy Changes
This week, our In Focus section reviews the final . The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rule, released January 13, 2025, describes the policy and payment parameters for issuers that participate in federally facilitated and state-based marketplaces in 2026.
The NBPP is particularly notable given that marketplace enrollment is at an all-time high. Last week, CMS that 24.2 million people joined a marketplace plan during 2025 Open Enrollment, last year鈥檚 historically high enrollment levels by more than 2 million people.[1] With millions more individuals covered in the individual market, this final rule presents several opportunities for the healthcare industry to improve the well-being of covered individuals and families and the financial health of participating organizations.
Marketplace policies are under scrutiny, however, from new Trump Administration officials and congressional leaders. Subsidies, eligibility, and reimbursement are among the topics receiving the greatest attention.
Key highlights from the final rule and considerations for stakeholders in the changing healthcare landscape follow.
Consumer Protections
The final rule further strengthens consumer protections, consistent with the policies advanced during the Biden Administration. CMS finalized policies to achieve the following:
Protect consumers from agents and brokers seeking to make unauthorized changes to their healthcare coverage
Allow the agency to take enforcement actions against lead insurance agents for violations of marketplace standards
Expand the agency鈥檚 authority to immediately suspend an agent or a broker鈥檚 ability to make transactions within the marketplace if the information creates an unacceptable risk to the accuracy of marketplace eligibility determinations, operations, applicants, or enrollees, or marketplace IT systems
Update the model consent form, which helps agents and brokers document consent from consumers to assist with their marketplace enrollments and submission of marketplace eligibility applications
Revisions to Marketplace User Fees
The enhanced premium tax credits are the driving force behind the in nationwide marketplace enrollment to more than 24 million today from 11.4 million in 2020. If not extended, or if Congress takes no action by July 31, 2025, CMS will increase the user fees collected to pay for administration of HealthCare.gov as follows:
Increase fees to 2.5 percent of monthly premiums in 2026 for federally facilitated marketplaces (FFM) states, up from 1.5 percent in 2025
Increase fees to 2.0 percent of monthly in 2026 for state-based marketplaces on the federal platform (SBM-FPs)鈥攗p from 1.2 percent in 2025
CMS also is finalizing an alternative set of user fee rates. If enhanced premium tax credit subsidies are extended through the 2026 benefit year by July 2025 at the current or a higher level the following user fees rates will apply:
2 percent for FFM states
1.8 percent for SBM-FPs
CMS originally proposed a March 2025 subsidy extension deadline for activating the lower user fee. Insurer should take into account the higher user fees when setting their 2026 premiums鈥擲BMs as they finalize their 2026 user fee levels and FFM states considering the costs of staying in Healthcare.gov or transitioning to a SBM.
Premium Payment Threshold Options
CMS finalized new options for insurers to avoid triggering late payment grace periods for members who make most but not all their premium payment. The new threshold options are intended to minimize termination of coverage for people who owe small amounts. The options include:
For the first month鈥檚 premium payment to effectuate coverage鈥攐r binder payments鈥攖he only option is to use a net premium threshold as low as 95 percent
For all other premium payments after the first month鈥檚 payment, the options include:
Net premiums as low as 95 percent or a fixed dollar threshold of up to $10
Gross premiums percent of as low as 98 percent or fixed dollar threshold of up to $10
Fixed dollar thresholds will be adjusted for inflation.
Information Sharing and Transparency
CMS is finalizing policies designed to increase transparency and promote program improvements by publicly releasing state marketplace operations data, including spending on outreach and additional open enrollment customer service metrics, such as for call center performance surveys and website visits. The final rule clarifies that CMS will not publicly release each SBM鈥檚 annual State-based Marketplace Annual Reporting Tool (SMART), a reversal from what was proposed.
In addition, CMS is finalizing that it will share aggregated, summary-level Quality Improvement Strategy (QIS) information publicly on an annual basis starting January 1, 2026, with data submitted during the 2025 qualified health plan application period.
奥丑补迟鈥檚&苍产蝉辫;Next/Key Considerations
The new leadership at the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and CMS will likely conduct a thorough review of these payment and policy changes. In consideration of potential repeals or modifications, states and marketplace plans will need to consider the following:
Uncertainty around extending or modifying Affordable Care Act subsidies
Potential statutory changes approved by Congress and regulatory changes from the Trump Administration
Review of existing operations and policies in light of the new regulations and the changing policy environment
Connect With Us
明升88 experts support states, managed care organizations, consumer groups, and other interested stakeholders to achieve success in the operation of and participation in the marketplaces. Our team has the broadest historical perspective on the challenges and opportunities in this market and can support every step of the planning and execution processes to optimize markets as they continue to evolve in the coming months and years. If you have questions or want to discuss the final rule, contact聽our experts below.
[1] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Over 24 Million Consumers Selected Affordable Health Coverage in ACA Marketplace for 2025. January 17, 2025. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/over-24-million-consumers-selected-affordable-health-coverage-aca-marketplace-2025.
This week, our In Focus section examines the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) calendar year (CY) , published January 10, 2025. That same day, CMS also released draft . This regulatory guidance includes CY 2026 payment updates as well as additional technical and methodological changes to MA and Part D for the coming plan year.
The release of the CY 2026 Advance Notice鈥攁long with the complementary CMS policy and technical proposed rule released in November 2024鈥攔epresent the last major Medicare regulations of the Biden Administration, and these annual payment and policy updates will be finalized under the incoming Trump Administration. As a result, the proposed MA and Part D payment policies could be modified before finalization in April 2025.
Comments on the Advance Notice are due by February 10, 2025, leaving a tight timeline for MA plans and other stakeholders to provide formal feedback and written comments to CMS. Following are brief summaries of the major proposals in the Advance Notice and key considerations for stakeholders as they analyze the proposals.
Payment Impact on Medicare Advantage Organizations
In the Advance Notice, CMS projects that federal payments to MA plans will increase by 4.33 percent from 2025 to 2026鈥攚hich represents a $21 billion increase in expected payments to MA plans next year. CMS estimates that federal payments to MA plans in 2026 will total $590.9 billion.
The proposed increase in payments accounts for several factors, including growth rates in underlying costs, changes to MA Star Ratings, continued implementation of the new risk adjustment model, and MA risk score trends. The estimated growth rate considers demographic changes in MA enrollment, including projected increases in the number of enrollees.
The Advance Notice estimates represent the average increase in payments to MA plans and actual payments will vary from plan to plan. Below, Table 1 provides estimates of the impact of proposed policy changes on net MA plan payments.
MA Risk Adjustment Changes
CMS intends to complete the three-year phase-in of the MA risk adjustment model that was first published in the CY 2024 Rate Announcement. Specifically, CMS proposes to calculate 100 percent of the risk scores using the new MA risk adjustment model, referred to as the 2024 hierarchical condition categories (CMS-HCC) framework. CMS maintains that the changes to the methodology for calculating risk have improved the predictive accuracy of the model while ensuring risk-adjusted payments to MA plans are accurate.
In addition, CMS has been working to calibrate the risk adjustment model based on MA encounter data, and CMS proposes to begin phasing in an encounter-based MA risk adjustment model as soon as CY 2027.
CMS also proposes to apply the statutory minimum MA coding pattern difference adjustment factor of 5.90 percent for CY 2026.
Technical Adjustment to Cost Calculations Related to Medical Education Costs
Similar to changes in the MA risk adjustment model, CMS plans to complete the three-year phase-in of technical adjustments to the per capita cost calculations related to indirect and direct medical education costs associated with services delivered to MA beneficiaries. This technical adjustment鈥攆inalized in the CY 2024 Rate Announcement鈥攈as reduced growth rates for MA plans because of the removal of MA-related medical education costs from the benchmarks.
MA Star Ratings
CMS reiterates its continued focus on moving toward a 鈥淯niversal Foundation鈥� of measures with the goal of creating metrics that center on clinical care, patient outcomes, and improved patient experiences and are aligned across CMS programs. In addition, CMS is soliciting initial feedback on both substantive measure specification updates as well as comments on new measure concepts. CMS also is seeking stakeholder feedback on modifications to the Health Equity Index, including adding social risk factors and geography (urban or rural) to the reward factor. Any specific changes to MA Star Ratings measures, including modifications to the Health Equity Index, would occur through the formal rulemaking process.
Medicare Part D Provisions
The CY 2026 Advance Notice and the include several payment and benefit updates as required in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022. The CY 2026 updates include:
The CY 2026 annual out-of-pocket cost threshold for Part D covered drugs is $2,100, which is the original out-of-pocket cap of $2,000 adjusted for the annual percentage increase in average expenditures for Part D covered drugs
Establishment of the selected drug subsidy program
Changes to the liability of enrollees, plan sponsors, drug manufacturers, and CMS in the standard Part D benefit design, specifically to account for the start of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program in 2026
Guidance on the successor regulation exception to the IRA鈥檚 formulary inclusion requirement for selected drugs under the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program
Other previously implemented IRA reforms will continue in CY 2026, including no cost sharing for Medicare beneficiaries for Part D covered drugs in the catastrophic phase, which begins after the annual out-of-pocket threshold of $2,100 is reached; a $35 monthly cap on enrollee cost sharing for insulin; no cost sharing for adult vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention鈥檚 (CDC鈥檚) Advisory Commission on Immunization Practices and covered under Part D; and the requirement for Part D plans to offer the Medicare Prescription Payment Plan to beneficiaries.
What to Expect
The CY 2026 Advance Notice includes important technical, programmatic changes and payment updates for MA and Part D plans, which will be finalized when CMS publishes the final CY 2026 Rate Announcement on or before April 7, 2025. MA plans and other stakeholders have a rigid timeframe to provide formal input and written comments to CMS before the February 10 deadline.
Like the policy and technical changes included in the MA proposed rule, the CMS Advance Notice payment updates will be finalized under the incoming Trump Administration. MA plans and other stakeholder can anticipate that the new leadership at the US Department of Health and Human Services and CMS will closely examine and take a fresh look at the proposed payment and policy changes. Though the current CMS leadership maintains that payment updates included in the Advance Notice are sufficient to support stability in MA premiums and benefits, proposed payment policies can be modified or delayed as the new leadership takes shape.
For example, officials in the Trump Administration could seek to delay the phase in of the risk adjustment changes as well as the technical adjustment regarding medical education costs, which CMS estimates would result in an additional $10.4 billion in payments to MA plans.
Connect With Us
Medicare experts at 明升88, will continue to assess and analyze the policy and political landscape, which will determine the final policies included in the CY 2026 Rate Announcement. HMA experts have the depth of knowledge, experience, and subject matter expertise to assist organizations that engage in the rulemaking process and to support implementation of final policies, including policy development, tailored analysis, and modeling capabilities.
For details about the CY 2026 MA Advance Notice and its impact on MA and Part D plans, providers, and beneficiaries, contact our featured experts below.
